SOL to the rescue.
Let's start with your out-of-total context quip from the AK constitution that we're a resource development state. You imply that we then have no other choice but develop each and every resource no matter what. You can't just use the parts of the constitution that support your point of view. The AK Constitution also says that we are conservation state too. And more importantly, that development must be based on sustainable yield.
So let's start with the Chuitna Coal project. OK - just to be clear, this mine would cut right through and destroy a world-class salmon stream by removing 11 miles of the river with an open-pit mine. The coal will be not be used here, but shipped off to China and will fuel their cheap-labor merchandise that will put more Americans out of work. Then they will burn this very dirty stuff and cause even more environmental damage to the planet. Oh, the tailings? Mercury, arsenic and other poisons that not only would destroy the water table there, but would flow into Cook Inlet.
And what about the salmon? We have ours with the Kenai River, so screw the rest? The salmon can be maintained as sustained yield guaranteeing Alaskans jobs and recreation for generations to come.
The open pit will sustain a few rich developers for a few years, create short-term jobs at the pit, but send many other Americans jobs to China.